Carbon use confusion

General discussion, not specific to any sub forum.
User avatar
korbine
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2024 4:26 am

Carbon use confusion

Post by korbine »

Been seeing mixed opinions on carbon in filters. Some say it's a must, others say it's sketchy. What's the deal? Running a 20-gallon planted tank with a HOB filter, stock carbon insert. Should I ditch it or keep it?
zipnex
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2022 12:41 pm

Re: Carbon use confusion

Post by zipnex »

Carbon's useful for removing meds or tannins, but it's not a must-have long-term. In a planted tank, it can strip trace elements plants need. If your water's clear and params are stable, 0 ammonia, 0 nitrite, 10 nitrate, you're better off swapping it for more bio media.
starfish9
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2024 2:59 pm

Re: Carbon use confusion

Post by starfish9 »

I agree with zipnex. I pulled carbon from my 30-gallon last month and noticed my Java Ferns perked up. Maybe it was messing with their nutrients. How often do you change your carbon, korbine?
User avatar
korbine
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2024 4:26 am

Re: Carbon use confusion

Post by korbine »

zipnex wrote: Thu Jul 10, 2025 1:06 pm Carbon's useful for removing meds or tannins, but it's not a must-have long-term. In a planted tank, it can strip trace elements plants need. If your water's clear and params are stable, 0 ammonia, 0 nitrite, 10 nitrate, you're better off swapping it for more bio media.
Got it. Gonna try ditching it and see if my Anubias stops melting. Thanks!
billow
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2024 8:51 pm

Re: Carbon use confusion

Post by billow »

Carbon's like that one friend who's helpful in a crisis but kinda drains you otherwise. Used it post-meds in my betta tank, then swapped to sponge. Bettas are chill now, plants too. What's your lighting schedule, korbine? Could be part of the melt.
bronzed
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2024 6:39 pm

Re: Carbon use confusion

Post by bronzed »

Carbon is unnecessary unless you're dealing with contaminants. Data from my 50-gallon shows no difference in water clarity or fish health after removal. Focus on bio filtration and weekly 25% water changes.
User avatar
lilynx
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2023 10:36 pm

Re: Carbon use confusion

Post by lilynx »

My LFS swore by carbon, but my tank's been happier without it. Less algae, more growth. Running a 10-gallon with a sponge filter, no carbon, and my Neon Tetras are thriving. Maybe it's overhyped?
User avatar
burrower
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat May 18, 2024 1:16 am

Re: Carbon use confusion

Post by burrower »

lilynx wrote: Thu Jul 10, 2025 4:00 pm My LFS swore by carbon, but my tank's been happier without it. Less algae, more growth. Running a 10-gallon with a sponge filter, no carbon, and my Neon Tetras are thriving. Maybe it's overhyped?
Same here! Ditched carbon, added Seachem Purigen instead. Way better vibe in the tank.
florer
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2024 6:53 pm

Re: Carbon use confusion

Post by florer »

Carbon's fine if you replace it weekly, but who's got time for that? My 40-gallon's been carbon-free for years, just sponge and ceramic rings. Water's crystal, fish are lively. Save your cash.
zipnex
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2022 12:41 pm

Re: Carbon use confusion

Post by zipnex »

bronzed wrote: Thu Jul 10, 2025 3:19 pm Carbon is unnecessary unless you're dealing with contaminants. Data from my 50-gallon shows no difference in water clarity or fish health after removal. Focus on bio filtration and weekly 25% water changes.
Exactly. Long-term, bio media's the move. Carbon's a short-term fix, like a band-aid on a filter.
Post Reply